Ancient papistical type culture looked at gladiators, strange fleshlys, and comedic contests as body- get on of frolic; practic totallyy as people in troupe today contrive pick out trading floorball for am social functionment. To meet the conduct for entertainment both the Colosseum and SAFECO subject field were doed as platforms for athletes and others to dazzle the poise crowds. Both coordinates allowed big(a) plurality of people to conjugate in fairness ara and behold the festivities that brought them to the edge of their set argona. The technology advancements in both(prenominal) geological eras throw away created an environment for all to gather. To compel the masses both stadiums were constructed in an elliptical shape which created different aims enabling e very whizz to see the events taking depict at an emphases bea in the concentrate on. To post the weight of m whatever people both fabricateings uses columns and arches as arc hitectural tools as fountainhead patterns for design. The very homogeneous ideas of arches and columns that were demo on the Colosseum, cautioned in the notional activity of the retract fit jacket seen on SAFECO stadium. In fact, the roof of SAFECO topic is a large arched structure supported by monolithic slue columns (Howard, 2000). Today, being equal to be forward of our cartridge holders is number from the classical age. thence allowing us to proceed in the foot of new and disagreeent ideas. cytosmear both the Colosseum and Seattles SAFECO demesne were constructed for entertainment purposes and were con billetred marvels for their era, by analyzing their structure, subject matter of complex body part, and sizing it becomes apparent the divergencys in the deuce stadiums. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â During the curb of the papistic imperium, the Colosseum was looked upon as a superb structure that stick the mind and inspired the imagination. People wou ld move from cities farther from the roman! capitol bonnie to marvel at the size and technology the Colosseum displayed. The forest instrumenten floor where all the performances took place; possess many a(prenominal) furnish and doors that retracted to reveal the hind chamber beneath. The complexity and multiform designs were far beyond the norm for the era. exclusively these attrisolelyes lead to the Colosseum gaining its fabled status. fleck technology has undoubtedly evolved from the era of the Roman Empire to now, Seattles SAFECO subject possesses much of the same status in our society as the Colosseum did in its metre. Everything from the 655 alkali retractile roof to the jumbo screen which uses the roofs steel beams for support, dazzles any baseball fan. Fans come from all oer to take care this staggering piece of ar iirk as they did the Roman Colosseum. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â though the pass to get to your seat may fox been different it is blue-blooded to see how the seating was alike. The Col osseum had covered balconies go with by servants much like the luxury boxes of SAFECO scene of action. Women and poorer respective(prenominal)s stood or sit down on wooden bleachers on the fourth level of the Colosseum. In meet for them to get to their seats they had to climb steep, sloping ramps. forthwith seats are more than than comfortable and come with section rests. In order to get to these seats one would have to evidently use the cover stairway. But architectures today copied those of the Roman era. They both built each seat to allow the decorous think level in front of them. Although the way to ones seat was slightly more convenient the architectural viewing level is the same. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â From the perspective of an architect, the blueprints for both buildings call for the use of tartar to be built properly. Without the correct mathematics the buildings may have ended up lop situationd or weak. In fact, it was in the Roman era that muc h of the math that is apply to construct buildings w! ays documented and use into architecture. The Romans so ahead of their eon were able to put four tiers together. Knowing the complications of that they were able to build all for at a perfect incline. development hundreds of archways and columns for support. The outdoor of the building was make with marble and concrete forming a unusual support. The builders of today that constructed SAFECO domain applied the same numerical techniques as the Romans. They too had to incline their 3 tier seating, but they went a step ahead. They had to perfectly place the lighting outline which was made of stainless steel; to perfectly fit when the 22 meg pounds of steel and fiber glass cognise as the retractable roof closes (Smith, 2000). As a result of these numerical principles both buildings posses angular measurements equal to the area of circles, rectangles, and all types of triangles. though the two buildings have an enormous gap in term betwixt their constructions, the sam e mathematical formulas and postulates were used to insure the potentiality and congruousness of the structures. A utmost drumhead of comparison is in the unquestionable action in which the two stadiums were constructed. Both stadiums began with recondite foundations that had to be created to combat the weak restency of the soil in which the stadiums were built. Because both stadiums were constructed in basin areas close to sea level the soil was very loose and the foundations had to be deep nice to reach the condensed precious stone below. In SAFECO Field they put 1,400 pilings 90 feet below the cornerstone to accommodate the oatmeal type soil. subsequently the foundations were established, the use of arches and columns were implemented to create the frequent shape and support for the buildings. To conclude the process the detailed seating and outward designs were created. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â While the purpose, status, seating, and general construction may have been extravagantlyly similar, at that place exists ! many secern elements as well. The actual material that the stadiums consist of is very different. The Colosseum was constructed of primarily of an early form of concrete and wood; while SAFECO Field consist of manly of concrete, steal ,synthetic medals, and fiberglass. From an architectural stand bear down, the lynchpin of the Colosseum rests in the arches and columns. On the contrary, columns and arches simply aid the welded steal rods, elemental wheels, and pulleys used to create SAFECO Field. The computers, motors, and other electronic components used to buy the farm the field are other, more obvious, differences. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â on similar lines, the means of construction and issue forth of time essential for construction differs amidst the two stadiums. The Colosseum was constructed by the use of break ones back and animal agitate.
Wooden ramps and pulleys hoisted the equipment needed to mold the concrete into the structure of the Colosseum today. This threatening process took 10 years to complete. In comparison, SAFECO Field was constructed in only 27 ½ months. High tech machinery and cranes took the place of the massive abundance of human labor needed to build the Colosseum. What makes the meat of time taken to build the stadiums even more stupefying are the relative sizes. The Colosseum stood roughly 160 feet high; when compared to just the 655 foot roof on SAFECO Field. Surprisingly however, the Colossseum holds most 5,000 more people than the capacity of SAFECO Field. Obviously the decorations and special features of the Colosseum are far less t han the 56X 60 scoreboard and 9 elevators of SAFECO F! ield. Though the time span and the material were very different the final product produced was magnificent.         A blatantly obvious difference in the structure of both buildings is the shape in which they are made. While they both use the ecliptic model for what is now known as stadium seating the Colosseum was built as cylinder, and SAFECO Field was constructed in the form of a rectangular prism. Because the Colosseum is cylindrical the dimensions from the sum primitive are all the same no theme what side the point of view is coming from. With these configurations the only aspect that affects the point of view is the level or height. In the case of SAFECO Field more than just the height affects the point of view. Because the seating is do in more of a triangular manner, the distance from the amount of money focal point to the actual point of view stooge vary depending on the exact location on the triangle. For example, whether an individual is seate d in the left, right, front, or back of the Colosseum doesnt matter as long as the heights are equivalent. At SAFECO Field, an individual seated in the center of outfield or base of the triangle has a short distance to a center vocal point than an individual seated at one of the triangles points. Because of this same principle the volumes of the two buildings would differ even if the dimensions are somewhat similar. After analyzing the purpose, seating aspects, general process of construction, and the mathematical principles used to build both the Colosseum and SAFECO Field it appears that the two structures are very similar. However when taking into friendship the means by which both builds were created it becomes noticeable that the two buildings parting contrasting elements produced by the large amount of time that passed between the building of the two stadiums. In addition, the length of time needed to build each structure, shape, seating capacity, and technology all appr ove as contrasting components. While both stadiums w! ere, and in many ways still are marvels of their era, time has transcended many of the aspects of the creation of such structures. Through time slave labor has been replaced by machines, and limestone concrete constructions have given way to bear upon concrete and steel stadiums. If you want to get a encompassing essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
