Lie Detection Study

Pawa. Ekta & Strand, Rickard IBPsych-HL/SL What were the aim, procedure and findings from the study? Aim: to see if in that respect was a to find a cognitive process which underlies hale types of lying Procedure: The participants were put in an MRI glance over and were abandoned a playing witticism. The machine then guessed which observation individually participant was given; every time it guessed refine the participants were back up to lie. What they did not know was that the computer which guessed the beleaguer already knew which card each participant had. Participants were further promote to lie, by get paid more if they could fool the computer. Findings: The findings was that some(prenominal) areas of the brain was nimble during lying such as the prior cingulate cortex which is a small brain structure that looks identical two halves of an apple. It is tough in the processes such paying attention, make judgment and inhibiting a persons responses. F urthermore the leftover prefrontal cortex was involved; this area is known to be involved in making inhibitory decisions. Strengths and limitations: The strengths of this study is that it eliminates the chases of gull a polygraph.

A polygraph measures skin temperature and blood pressure which is put on to increase in truthful persons when told a lie scarce coldblooded liars can and so fool the test. Also the feeling of suffer creates the same reactions from the dead body which wakes it possible to crate mistaken positives during a test. The strengths of this test then is that its a plentifulness harder to c heat the test because you cannot defy the a! ctivity of the brain. Limitations to this is that it is expensive and solace very cost inefficient, in any case this prove was done in a laboratory and the picture of a court room or a prison domicil can alter the results.If you want to get a massive essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper