Hamlet’s antic disposition is feigned Essay

settlement has been known as maven of the greatest of Shakespe atomic number 18s plays. This is mainly because the protagonist has confused learned minds for centuries on end with his complex personality and muddled thoughts, which in cut into leads onto his actions, or rather inaction. His incomprehensibility by valety leads me only to conclude that he is mad.His irrational and rational thoughts are forever in conflict out-of-pocket to his state of depression and paranoia therefore, he chooses to put on an antic thirst which serves as a convenient outlet to his sanity slipping away(predicate) (Wilson), masking the true nature of his mind, which has become far g iodine(p), far g bingle. In settlements introduction, we see him portrayed as a weak, melancholic man as exemplified through his clothes of nighted colours.He is consumed by the grief of the passing of his father, the dexterity of which his mother re-marries, and her pleasure in entering the incestuous sheets with Claudius, settlements Uncle. This melancholic state is shown to be quite serious in his soliloquies, where he states that he wants to Thaw and crack up himself into a dew. This sorrowful bubble of suicide crown shows settlements melancholic mind which layabout be perceived as mad.In the Elizabethan time, Hamlets melancholy would obligate been seen as an unbalance of humour, therefore, although not as blatant as Ophelias madness, Hamlet would have still been perceived to be insane. Perhaps in the modern day, one would state that Hamlet is not concludedly certified that he is insane, simply rather that there is an underlying layer of aberration in Hamlets unconscious which influences the temperamental consciousness which the audience sees on stage.Freud states that the conscious mind is similar to a fountain which rises from a great subterranean pool, which is the subconscious. Complying with this image, out-of-pocket to the fact that Hamlet is inclined to take the p ath of self-slaughter, which he would have done were it not for his fear of Gods legislation gainst it, I can only conclude that Hamlet is e exploitally and mentally damaged. He consciously clings onto his conscious sanity by turning his iniquity towards Gertrudes incestuous sheets however, he is already rotten subconsciously due to his depression.Stoll states that Hamlet was a renaissance man, loving contemplation. implying that Hamlet never intended to take part in murder and insanity, but is scarcely an intellectual spirit (Coleridge). However, the renaissance was a time of change, a revitalisation of learning and culture. How can Stoll justify Hamlets thoughts of suicide with such an absurd argument as he was a renaissance man? His thoughts of to be or not to be are marks of tilt towards the path of suicide however, suicide is nothing but an escape.It certainly does not relate to a renaissance man whose method of thinking would be that of intellectual learning and chang e for the better. It is a simple product of his insanity which is in turn produced by his melancholia. Perhaps Hamlets treatment of Ophelia is the prevailing factor in which we can clearly see Hamlets insanity. Wilson Knight states that he is murdering his love for Ophelia, on the brink of insanity, fetching delight in cruelty. Hamlet has been summed up quite well indoors this quote, however, Knight is mistaken in stating that Hamlet was on the brink of insanity.Hamlet was not on the brink. He has passed the brink and locomote into his dismal insanity this is clearly exemplified through his temperamental demeanour. In his letters, Hamlet writes to Ophelia, never doubt I love, however, in his scene completely with Ophelia, he labels her a whore and states that he loved you (Ophelia) not. His behaviour here cannot be justified by assumptions that he realised Polonius and his Uncle were there, for he only realises this sometime later on his mood swings where is your father? T he fact that he suspects another movement to be in the room only still conveys his paranoia. In the nunnery scene of Kenneth Branaghs Hamlet, Hamlet hears a faints hale which gives him evidence to presume Polonius is present, however, in the original text, there is no such pause or sound. It is said in a fluent motion which when read out loud, making clear that his thoughts are compiled haphazardly upon one another exemplifying his imbalanced mind. Ophelia was not acting differently to him thus far his insanity manifested itself as paranoia.It is a mere coincidence that this paranoia was founded. His treatment of Ophelia is a clear case where his insanity looms into his conscious. Surely this shows his deterioration and progression towards complete subconscious and conscious insanity. Hamlets later exclamation that he loved Ophelia in the graveyard scene with apparent sorrow clearly contradicts his earlier statement that he loved her not. Why he would state such lies to a women he loved for he had no reason to say he loved her after she was dead is puzzling.It is clear that insanity had created his imbalanced mind, and the graveyard scene merely shows that shreds of his mind in the first place his depression and insanity set in are still present. other such case where Hamlet shows conscious insanity is in his talk with Polonius where he calls Polonius a fishmonger and answers his questions irrationally. Although he whitethorn mask it as attempting to fool Polonius and others by acting insane, Hamlet is too convincing. Hamlet has precondition too much away and shown his insanity.The foolish Polonius states that Hamlets replies are pregnant with meaning, but Hamlet has merely succeeded in convincing Polonius with mere wit. The only thing Hamlet is pregnant with is his insanity which grows and shows itself in serious bloom later in the play. Analysis of Hamlets pass leads quite nicely into his possible Oedipal complex. This is the theory which postulat es that Hamlet represses his subconscious familiar desires for Gertrude and it is this subconscious sexual frustration which influences his conscious behaviour to become one of obsession and temperamental paranoia.Ernest Jones states that Hamlet feels anguish caused by his father beingness replaced in his mothers affections and that the affection he feels for his mother has underlying erotic qualities. In regards to the replacement of his father, this is quite understandable, for change is hard. His father, Hamlets idol (as clearly conveyed through his talks of him as a Hyperion) has been finished and the whole structure has fallen. Hamlet wishes to roughly become his father due to the subconscious sexual desires that would be fulfilled if he was to achieve this.Therefore, it is only natural that he would feel hate for an intruder Claudius for he is almost taking what his subconscious describes as rightfully his. In the closet scene, where Hamlet says to Gertrude that he will set up a glass where you can see the inmost part of you, there is a certain equivocalness in the statement which could have one meaning of reflecting evaluation, and another much sexually explicit meaning. In Kenneth Branaghs Hamlet, this line is vividly conveyed as if he was about to rape Gertrude.Possibly obsession and insanity followed the fretfulness which spewed out of him coming up to this line, and were it not for the foolish actions of Polonius, it would have kaput(p) unless. Hans Eysenck has regarded this theory as idle scheme. However, it is not merely speculation for the evidence supporting such a theory refutes this claim. Due to the presence of the Oedipal complex, Hamlets speech clearly shows an obsession with the coupling of Claudius and Gertrude.Although this may be due to revenge, the focus on the incestuous sheets and adulterous further supports the Oedipal. Moreover, if Hamlets mind was completely focused on revenge, then he would have carried out the vengef ul murder directly after the play. He does not because he is confused and internally conflicting against his subconscious sexual desires and his conscious revenge ideas. This is why he does not go through Claudius for quite some time. These conflictions within his psyche is a clear distinctive of an imbalanced mind implying his insanity.