Reitman’s Financial Analysis Essay

Reitmans Financial Analysis From an analysis of the accompanys ratios over the last three years since 2009, as found in the Appendix Exhibit _, the quantitative data reveals an unfavourable trend in performance. Liquidity Reitmans has the strongest current ratio when compargond to its competitorsThe Gap and Le Chateauat or so double their value. However, the Companys ratio has been in decline since 2009 at that time, it was at 4. , then fell to 4. 3, and finally, to 4. 1 in 2011. This trend reveals a slight decline in Reitmans short-term liquidity however, scour with the decline, the Company has more than enough liquidity to meet their short-term cash requirements. It could even be argued that they are not utilizing their assets to their full potential, as the usual unimpeachable current ratio is 21.Even when stock is not considered, as with the quick ratio and cash ratio, Reitmans ratios are unusually high when compared to their competitorswhich adds posture to the argument that they are not utilizing their assets as effectively as they could be if they were to invest their funds instead of leaving them sitting idle inside an account. Asset Management As revealed by their inventory turnover of 1. 2, Reitmans sells its inventory more slowly than its competitor, the Gap, does with their ratio of 5. 7 in 2011.However, the Gap whitethorn have a higher than normal turnover, as Reitmans is favourable when compared to their other(a) competitor, Le Chateau. The Companys accounts receivable turnover has remained relatively unchanging over the past three years, fluctuating slightly but ease taking just one day on average to gather in from customers. In contrast, Reitmans accounts payable turnover has been experiencing an unfavourable decline since 2009 it used to let in just 106 days to make payments to suppliers, but now it takes 257 days, over doubly the time.Long-term Debt Paying Ability Reitmans debt ratio measures the extent of creditor financing and leverage. Their dowery of debt, 22%, is much smaller than their competitors at 63% and 39% and a result, Reitmans is much more solvent and more able to maintain their long run financial viability. Further, when looking at the Companys times touch on earn, we see that Reitmans is considered to be less-risky for lenders as they are able to earn their decided interest charges ver 3 times per year this exceeds the general guideline that says creditors are reasonably safe if the company has a times interest earned ratio of two or more times. Profitability Most merchandising companies need sufficient gross profit in order to deal out their operating expenses or else they will likely fail. Reitmans, as similar to their competitors, maintains a higher profit ratio of 64% in 2011 and 67% in 2010. Even though the Companys other measures of profitability are still favourable compared with their competitors, Reitmans profitability ratios have declined by almost half(prenominal) from 2010 to 2011.