Outline of persuasive speech Essay

Specific purpose To persuade my auditory modality that IQ scrutiny is not a valid measure to be aimd on innovational populations.Central Idea At the end of my vocabulary the audience will know all about the disadvantages of IQ running playing in addition to the bad impact it has on todays lodge. admittanceAfter taking 3 different IQ tests and averaging the results I toilette tell you that my IQ is either of 82 which is considered as low fair(a) or of 123 which is considered as superior Ask yourself wizard question would you wager at me differently if you knew which one it really is?At the end of the speech youll know all about the disadvantages of IQ testing and why it is not a fit measure to be used on modern populations.Im passing game to first tell you about the consequences that a low IQ test result usher out have on a persons life, then Im going to tell you about how the IQ test is in fact not as true as anyone would think and finally even though it might not be 10 0% reliable it is still the trounce existing way of measuring logic.BodyI- A low IQ test score can result in having a psychological as well as a social impact on the test taker. A. Social impact1. The most dangerous assumption on IQ testing is that it measures someones biological or internal apprehension that is set in stone and so can never change. The family and the teachers of someone with a low IQ will expect oft less of that person which will then fail because of the lack of encouragements he is receiving.2. Moreover, according to Bruce Uditsky in his article One of the original purposes of IQ tests was to doctor or predict which students would require additional help to be self-make in school. It then is an interesting question as to how these IQ make headway evolved into stigmatizing, categorizing, racially prejudiced and negatively life-defining outcomes for students with developmental disabilities and others. B. A child with a low IQ score will start feeling modest to hisfriends specially that at a young age competition between friends is at its peek. The negative labels applied as a consequence of an IQ test are lifelong and in the current context of our society limiting and hurtful. variety therefrom it is important to ask ourselves if this test that can determine if someone is mentally less capable than someone else is in fact reliable enough. II- The reasons why intelligence quotient tests are not reliable enough A. A score can differ significantly from one IQ test to another(prenominal) taken by the same(p) person, in the same conditions 1- During 20022003, as part of validation for their new IQ test, the KABC-II, Alan and Nadeen Kaufman looked at IQ test scores from a dozen children aged 12-13 who were well-tried on three different contemporary IQ tests. The first affair to note is that those exposed to greater opportunities for learning tended to score higher on IQ tests than those from lower-SES backgrounds. But even collapsing acro ss SES, e very(prenominal) single preadolescent had a different IQ score based on which test they took. The differences for the dozen children ranged from 1 to 22 points, with an average difference of 12 points. 2- Therefore if a child scored 75 on a test he would be labeled as slow learner, but it is very possible that the same child could have scored 95 on another approved IQ test, and a score of 95 is an average score. B. Moreover, IQ tests are culturally unfair, most of the approved ones are designed for use among white middle class children. And as we can see in this slide, an average Ethiopian person would be considered retarded in Hong Kong. Transition On the other hand IQ tests are still the outflank way to measure logical thinking and can benefit children who train a good score on it. III- Benefits of IQ testingA. If a student who has a high score is having difficulties learning, directly an assumption is made that his learning processes needs to be understood and educat ional strategies need to be applied in order to help the student become successful. B. In addition, if we dont generalize it to be a test that measures intelligence IQ testing is the best way to measure logical abilities, which is the close set(predicate) thing to intelligence.ConclusionIn conclusion, because IQ tests are administered by kind beings on human beings, they are not 100% reliable and the same person can get verydifferent results on dickens different tests and because they are culturally unfair IQ tests shouldnt be considered as a valid measure of human intelligence and therefore a person with a low score should not be categorized and stigmatized for life.ReferencesUdistky, B. (n.d.). IQ testing A critique for parents of children with developmental disabilities. www.acl.org. Retrieved celestial latitude 5, 2013, from http//www.aacl.org/clientuploads/documents/IQarticle.pdfKaufman, S. B. (2013, July 7). IQ tests hurt kids, schools and dont measure intelligence. www.sa lon.com Retrieved December 5, 2013, from http//www.salon.com/2013/07/07/iq_tests_hurt_kids_schools_and_dont_measure_intelligence/Countries with the Highest / worst Average IQ. (n.d.). Statistic Brain RSS. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from http//www.statisticbrain.com/countries-with-the-highest-lowest-average-iq/